![]() These cookies help to improve the performance of BenQ. For me, screen calibration was a waste of money.Performance cookies and advertising cookies This may be user error, but I print exactly the same way now as before: I have a sense of what the printed output will look like, adjust image, print, repeat. I've played around with color profiles, different print drivers, etc., and find that I need to do trial and error printing every time. The printed output still looks different than my monitor (Canon Pro-100). I bought a screen calibration system but have found it nearly worthless. when you save your pictures for everyone else. yes, most people are viewing on non-calibrated montiors.īut by you editing your pictures on a calibrated monitor, then your pictures are neutral / in the middle, so more chance that it will look good.īut more importantly, if someone decides to print that picture, because it is the correct colours, it will have the best chance to look good printed. And, it has different grey patches so I can fine-tune the colour balance by sampling the grey patches in Lightroom.Īs for viewing on monitors. That picture will then let my computer build a profile for my camera. Now, when I start a portrait session, I can have the subject hold up the X-Rite ColorChecker Passport. This is where the X-Rite ColorChecker Passport is supposed to help. for big portrait sessions, I was finding that I was taking a long time to get the pictures to the colours I wanted. If you edit your pictures with a calibrated monitor, and additionally if you actually get the printer profile from the trade printer and soft proof your pictures, you can save money and get the colours you want.īut. it costs more and you don't know what you are going to get back. they can colour correct the pictures for you. I also send off prints to a trade printer. it is nice to know that I am handing over pictures that I know are properly colour corrected, because I can see it on my monitor. In addition to the club's yearbook, since then I have actually gotten into doing portrait photography. The last yearbook I worked on, I didn't even ask the printer for a printed proof. Now that I got the X-Rite ColorMunki Display, I've gotten more comfortable on how to edit the pictures to get the results I want in the final print. This added cost & time to the printing process. I'd make the changes, give them back to the graphic designer and we'd wait for the next printed proof. When we would get the printed proof back, I'd have to go look at the proofs and then mark which ones needed changing and which ones were too dark, etc. The thing with sending in the pictures to the person designing the yearbook was that before getting the X-Rite ColorMunki Display, I couldn't be sure what the images were going to look like. Then I volunteered to try to get shots of more of the athletes on the team for the yearbook and the year-end video. I originally started taking pictures of my daughter at gymnastics. To me, this is where I found the time savings. I have to say I am really happy that I am using X-Rite equipment! I'm just getting my head around how to use it, but for big projects, shooting RAW and adding this to your workflow, I can see how it will save even more time!!! I actually just picked up the X-Rite ColorChecker Passport last month for a shoot I have this month. I got an X-Rite ColorMunki Display 3 maybe 4 years ago.Īnd it has saved me so much time and has allowed me to get the colours I want!!! Also, when you send an image file out for people to look at, you have no control over their monitor so calibration is exactly worthless for that. I don't think there's any benefit when I'm just looking at images on the monitor you can get used to anything. I calibrate my monitor with an X-Rite Display Pro and find that it improves color accuracy when I have prints made. I am curious about other people's experience with it and the calibrating effect. Not sure if it's worth keeping the ColorMunki Display. It was originally set to "Technicolor" preset. Other than that it's just images shared on the web.Īt any rate, I do question the profile on my HP monitor though it may just be my eyes were accustomed to a cooler and brighter display. I'm not printing anything myself but there is a chance that photos I edit might inevitably go to a printer. On my HP 22er monitor, it was a little more noticeable change, brightness went down a lot more and overall a much warmer tone. Seemed to do a slight tweak on my MacBook Pro, warmed up the display slightly and dropped the brightness a little. Picked up an X-Rite Color Munki Display from an acquaintance for a decent price thinking it would be good to edit photos on my laptop, external screen, iPad with accurate colours. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |